Motorola XOOM Tablet: Hot or Not?

In 2010, the iPad was introduced, and for a while, it was the only major tablet on the market, meaning it dominated the market share. But now, new tablets are being released every which way, from companies you’d expect, like Acer and HP, and companies you wouldn’t, like Viewsonic and Motorola. Motorola’s new XOOM tablet has one advantage over all the other Android tablets: it’s the first. It was the first to hit the shelves with Android 3.0, the tablet optimized version of Google’s popular mobile OS. So, is it really that great?

The XOOM, which starts at $600 on Verizon, has similar features to the iPad 2. It’s got a ten inch screen, a 5MP back camera and a 2MP on the front. The power button is on the back, and I’m still wondering where the logic is on that one. Inside it’s a little different: the big benefit it has is that it has Flash player, so it can take advantage of the internet at its fullest. That’s a big thing on the iPad, as some would consider the iPad’s lack of Flash as its biggest problem. When I first saw the buzz for the XOOM on the web, I was skeptical. I wondered: who would ever pay a hundred more bucks than an iPad for something that…wasn’t even an iPad? But when I first got my hands on one, I realized that the XOOM’s biggest weapon isn’t necessarily its hardware: it’s the superior software. Android 3.0 (“Honeycomb”) really does have an edge over iOS, as the interface is phenomenal, and everything seems a lot cleaner and more mellow than on the iPad, which some consumers might like. Almost none of the apps are tablet-optimized, so the XOOM is way behind the iPad’s 60,000+ apps optimized for its screen size. I found the pricing of the XOOM a tad bit peculiar, though: shouldn’t the unsubsidized version cost less, like on the iPad? Overall, the XOOM is pretty much a draw. If you want Android’s newest system right now, this could be a good choice (especially with 4G support coming), but loads of Honeycomb tablets are right around the corner, so it could be a good idea to wait. We’ve compared some key features on the XOOM with the iPad right below, so you can be the judge of what’s the hotter device.

iPad vs XOOM



  1. I have purchased both an Ipad2 and Xoom for different family members. I thought it worth comparing the two devices for anyone interested. Many of my comments are subjective so bear that in mind when reading the review. I notice that reviews that love the Xoom are overwhelmingly marked “helpful” and those with even slight negatives are are usually marked “unhelpful”, so I expect this review will get poor ratings.

    External appearance and feel:
    The Ipad2 screen has a different feel from the Xoom screen – the Ipad2 is a bit slicker, less likely to stick when moving short distances. The screen on the Xoom tends to show fingerprints more than the Ipad2 for some reason. Everyone in this family thinks that the Ipad2 looks sharper than the Xoom.

    Both weigh 1.6 lbs. Subjectively, the Xoom feels heavier than the Ipad2, but it’s an illusion perhaps caused by it’s slightly smaller size.

    Both have a similar size screen, measured diagonally. But the aspect ratio is different – 4:3 for Ipad2, 16:9 for Xoom. This means that the Ipad2 actually has a larger viewing area, and this makes a real difference when scrolling through a web site. The Ipad2 screen is brighter than the Xoom screen.

    Hardware performance:
    The Xoom feels a bit faster than the Ipad2, and the specs show that it is faster. Both have dual core processors based on ARM designs. The Xoom seems to be able to handle graphics better than the Ipad2. As far as connecting to Wifi networks, both seem to have this one down pat – they both just work.

    User Interface:
    The Ipad2 is just like a big iPhone. Whether this good or bad is subjective. For me, it’s good – polished, flexible and can be customized to my needs. The Xoom user interface is totally new, and unfortunately it shows – there are many rough edges. Some examples: moving icons around to group programs together is not intuitive and they keep moving back; you can see the first 5 applications running on the Xoom and select one, but the list doesn’t scroll so applications that don’t show in the list can’t be selected; you can’t close applications (except by a force quit that can lose data) as the Xoom decides when to quit an application; customization is possible but more difficult than the Ipad2. In short, the Xoom user interface is a work in progress – great potential but currently quite flawed.

    Operating System:
    The Ipad2 uses Apple’s IOS. It works, but it uses cooperative multitasking which (in theory) is less effective than the full multitasking on the Xoom which uses a version of Google’s Android designed for tablets. In practice, they both work fine and I doubt anyone would notice the difference.

    Ipad2 has 70,000 apps available from the Apple App store and it also runs the 300,000 apps available for the iPhone. Xoom currently has around 60 apps and it can run Android phone apps (but they are stretched in one direction which makes them look strange). Some of the Ipad2 applications are pretty impressive – GarageBand for example. There are many games on the Ipad2, and just a few games made for the Xoom. I really hope this improves soon otherwise the Xoom is sunk. After all, applications are generally the reason people buy these devices.

    Because of the screen aspect ratio that I mentioned, I prefer browsing on the Ipad2. The Xoom has Adobe Flash and the Ipad2 doesn’t, but so far I haven’t come across a single instance where this has been an issue. I’m sure there are very many sites not compatible with Ipad2, but I haven’t browsed to one of them yet.

    I don’t use the camera much, and I’m not really sure if either is better. In the family, the Xoom owner says the Xoom is better, the Ipad2 owner says the Ipad2. The Xoom has flash and Ipad2 doesn’t which is a win for Xoom, but the Xoom seems slower to take a picture.

    The Xoom has two small speakers, Ipad2 has one somewhat larger speaker. The sound is slightly better quality on the Ipad2 and the Xoom cannot achieve the same volume as the Ipad2. But they are both pretty poor – use earphones or an external speaker if you want decent audio.

    Battery life:
    Difficult for me to give an exact comparison, but based on family usage it seems the Ipad2 has the edge here, but not by much.

    Internal storage:
    The Xoom has 1GB of RAM and 32 GB of flash storage. The Ipad2 has 512MB of RAM and 16GB, 32GB or 64GB of flash storage – I bought the 64GB model.

    External storage:
    The Xoom has an external card slot that supports SD cards, but the software was not ready in time for the product release. The slot is inoperative until Motorola releases an operating system update. The Ipad2 has no external storage support.

    User Experience:
    The Ipad2 was up and running quite quickly. I connected the device to ITunes and it automatically updated to the latest version of the operating system. I was then able to select and download Apps immediately and start using them.

    The Xoom was not so easy. For some reason, I was not able to install the latest version of Google Maps or Adobe Flash. I was able to download the apps, and the install process appeared to work without errors, but the new apps just were not installed. After some time trying I finally returned the Xoom back to the factory settings and started again, and this time both the installs worked. Of course, this wouldn’t be a good solution if you had a ton of applications and/or data on the device.

    Apple has their retail stores. You can get a huge amount of help from these stores from people whose only job is to support users. Both Ipad2 and Xoom users have web sites available that support their products but you have to spend the time digging for the sites and digging through the sites. You can also purchase an Applecare support package which gives you a couple of years extra support for the Ipad2.

    Bottom line:
    I believe the Xoom hardware is slightly better than the Ipad2 (apart from the screen aspect ratio and the speakers), but the software is terribly lacking. The Xoom was released FAR too early, it’s just not ready for primetime. But it has great potential.

    If I had to pick just one, I’d pick the Ipad2 at the moment – less hassle, apps for everything, better browsing experience, better support options. The Xoom needs less buggy software and more applications; it has great potential but it’s not there yet.

  2. Pingback: Nexus 7: Hot or Not? | AppRecap

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: